Monthly Archives: February 2018

Me and my Big Mouth

The spring-like weather finally gave way to overnight snow.On an enforced day off. Having a Writing Day. Will struggle down to the pub at lunchtime.

Snow for Blog

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Comment/Opinion

Snow: Fake News?

Leighton Buzzard, 4.30 pm. Still a sunny, spring-like, day. No sign of “The Beast from the East”, the killer cold weather that ‘s meant to be sweeping in from Siberia.

I went downtown for a pint earlier. They’re all talking about it on the bus and in the pub. Ok, there was a brief flurry of snowflakes, about ten of them. The bus drivers were talking about what to do on their enforced day off tomorrow. Dream on.

I blame the media for the panic. BBC News predicted folk dropping dead from heart attacks. Train companies had already cancelled trains – before a snowflake had even settled!

Coming out of the gym, a woman wore a hat – just to walk to her car! I wore my shorts at Morrison’s as I always do after the gym. It was a grand day, if a bit nippy, like.

What is it with this country: the tiniest threat of snow and the roads and rails grind to a halt. Are people dropping dead in Iceland and Canada?

I’ll see what’s happening when I watch the news at six. I expect it’s snowing in Scotland. If it snows seriously here I’ll offer my apologies tomorrow.

Leave a comment

Filed under Comment/Opinion

Boris and his Bridges

(Original edit of article written for Taxi magazine).

So, Boris Johnson has suggested a bridge spanning the English Channel? It’s a shame no-one has supported his idea – it sounds great! The idea might seem fanciful, but it’s entirely possible that Boris’s idea could be realised with the right backing. Had the French suggested it, the suggestion would have been taken seriously, but because it’s that mischievous mop-top, people just laugh about it. Maybe people remember his garden bridge idea, the one that cost the taxpayer £46 million without a brick being laid? Fair enough, but at least he has a go.

The bridge idea seems strange in the light of Britain’s forthcoming exit from the European Union, but if we managed to bridge the English Channel, it would open France wide open to both tourism and commuters. Structurally it’s do-able.

A bridge would be much more versatile than the present tunnels for trucks and trains. A bridge could open up the continent to many forms of transport, including pedestrians. There could be some kind of tram connecting the two towns at both ends. Pedestrians wouldn’t normally be expected to walk the whole length, but there could be a rank of Boris Bikes at the foot of the bridge. I wonder if taxi drivers from Kent ever get any runs to France? The bridge could lend itself to fixed-price shuttle services from both the English and the French side (cross-border hiring legislation will need to be looked at).

Any new bridge project would have to be planned properly though. Would it be built to British or French specifications? Would they switch to driving on the other side of the road half way over? The bridge would have to be very long, but also very wide. I expect the French would want to build a few wine bars and patisseries on it. Very nice too. And they’d need a bit of greenery on which to walk their little doggiess. This could be a garden bridge by the back door, only bigger and better.

A bridge administered by the British is more troubling – just look at the London bridges that we are familiar with. Although it would be in Kent, the British section would no doubt be run in accordance with TfL’s anti-motorist agenda. How long before contractors are sent to mark out cycle lanes? A paved strip will then appear down the middle of the carriageway, to provide jaywalkers an unlimited crossing space, and to provide an extra lane for cyclists and motorcyclists, just like Regent Street or The Stand. Segregated vehicle, cycle and pedestrian lanes – by all means; but please don’t let it resemble the chaos of the London bridges. It’s not just the old mayor that we need to worry about; the present one needs watching too.

The foot of the bridge would soon become an untidy mess of rickshaws and Uber cars. Ice cream vans will appear on the bridge; plus pavement artists, blokes painted silver, &c., &c…  I feel sorry for the good burghers of Dover or Calais if that bloke with the bagpipes re-locates from Westminster Bridge.

It must be about twenty-six miles from Dover to Calais – about the same length of a marathon. This won’t go un-noticed by interested parties. In no time, the bridge will start being closed for running and cycling events; perhaps food festivals, bus rallies, Pedestrian-only shopping Sundays, and American football promotions. Imagine the Christmas light switch-on?

Some people think travel through the European Union will become more difficult, but I don’t think things will change too much. We had to show passports at the French border in the 70s, and we still do. Security would have to be high though, and that’s not cheap. A new border would be created with passport and immigration checks. If there are any terrorist incidents in Europe, it won’t be long before metal barriers are put in to narrow everything down further.

None of this will affect us in London, but British pride is at stake. We have the opportunity to show our EU friends across the water that we’re still open for business and that we are still proud Europeans. We don’t need celebs to open the bridge; just someone with some enthusiasm: I’d have the chap with the flags at that tourist shop on Piccadilly Circus to do it.

It’s an exciting vision from Boris, and I commend it to the house.

Leave a comment

Filed under Published Articles

Changes on the Cards

(Original edit of article for Taxi magazine)

I was pleased to hear we no longer have to pay fees when paying for certain items by credit card, but relief turned to dismay when I heard retailers bleating on about a loss of revenue and how they’d put their prices up or impose new fees in order to get their  transaction money back.

Travel companies and ticket agencies save money by not having to maintain a physical space in which to sell us their wares. With most ticket retailing done on-line, people are necessarily going to be paying by some sort of card, so are open to charges. The alternative is for these companies to only accept debit cards, for which no fee is charged. If you’ve recently paid your tax bill on-line you may have noticed that you can no longer pay with a personal credit card. We have no choice whether we pay tax, or to whom we pay it, but we have a choice who we buy tickets from.  I can’t imagine companies stopping people paying by credit card, so they’ll look at other ways to claw back their lost revenue.

Raising our fares to cover credit card fees is not something we can do. It’s not something I’d want to do either in these times of austerity. I also wouldn’t want to go back to the days of charging our customers fees for paying by card.

It’s not right that we were forced into accepting cards, but it’s surely brought us more work. Taking cards has been compulsory for well over a year now. The issue has faded, but there are still nagging concerns. For one, there’s the feeling that we have lost a little of our autonomy. For three hundred years we dealt only in cash and it worked fine.  Finance companies make money out of us for supplying the equipment and processing payments, and it feels uncomfortable entering into financial agreements with outside agencies in order to take a taxi fare – at a cost to ourselves. I don’t get involved with a finance company directly because my equipment is integrated into my ComCab system, but I’ve heard drivers with different arrangements have been threatened with having their machines taken away through under-use: not making enough money for the machine supplier. Taxi garages have also been told to ensure their card machines are used more!

I don’t promote the use of cards. A payment can take two minutes to complete, and there’s always the fear that something will go wrong. Sometimes it does. Customers don’t always find using the keypad easy; possibly because there is a confusion of different systems being used in cabs. I’ve had two people walk off before realising the payments haven’t gone through. I don’t know whether this has been done or purpose. I don’t see the same detail on my ComCab screen as the customer sees on the keypad, fixed out of sight behind my head. If a driver has a major with his system can he get assistance beyond nine to five?

Despite these concerns, it’s better than the alternative of having a mixed fleet of cash-only/card-friendly cabs. The public have confidence they can pay by card when they approach us, and no longer need to walk down a rank asking if we accept cards. This avoids frustration and resentment.

Sadly, I’m no longer waved in to the front of a hotel rank and loaded up for Heathrow while cash-only wallahs sat fuming, but mandatory card acceptance has brought us all more work. It’s not all plain sailing, but the price has been worth paying. And we can hold our heads up and take the moral high ground against those rapacious travel agents.

Has technology made card acceptance more difficult? I remember a time many years’ ago when in a shop or restaurant they’d bring a huge metal machine over. I was only a kid in the 1970s, but I remember it being the size of those contraptions they used to measure your feet with at Clark’s. They’d put your card on the machine and physically swipe it. You’d leave with a carbon copy of the transaction. I assume the retailer would send all their copies off to the credit card company and receive payment in due course. I don’t think there was any wireless technology, and the system was never “down”.  They didn’t need a signal, just a bit of carbon paper. It was simple, but it worked. Why does everything have to be so complicated these days? I know that under TfL rules a hand-held machine isn’t officially allowed, but I wonder if we could still get our hands on those machines?

Leave a comment

Filed under Published Articles